In a dramatic turn of events, the Trump administration has initiated a lawsuit against three members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) board who have refused to vacate their positions following their dismissal by President Trump. The White House had officially notified Democratic board members Laura Ross, Thomas Rothman, and Diane Kaplan on April 28 that their board appointments were terminated effective immediately. While the president's decision would have reduced the board to just two Republican members, the CPB chose to defy this directive and continued operations with five members. The U.S. government's lawsuit claims that Ross, Rothman, and Kaplan are unlawfully occupying their positions and have been acting outside the bounds of their authority as board members of the CPB. The complaint references recent Supreme Court rulings that underline the president's constitutional right to appoint and remove federal officials as a fundamental aspect of executive power. The Justice Department's statement emphasized that the defendants have continued to function in their roles despite their official removal and have not secured any legal remedy to justify their ongoing positions. The DOJ is asking the court to formally recognize that these former members have not held valid board seats since their termination, seeking an injunction against their service and demanding the return of any compensation received during their unlawful tenure. Adding to the tension, the Trump administration is concurrently urging Congress to revoke funding previously allocated to the CPB, which primarily supports PBS and NPR. This proposal is currently under debate in the Senate. In response, the CPB and the dismissed board members filed a counter-suit on April 29, asserting that the president lacks the authority to terminate board members. They argue that the CPB operates as a private corporation designed to be free from government interference, a safeguard established by Congress to maintain its independence. The lawsuit contends that the only circumstances under which board members can be removed before the end of their six-year terms relate to attendance at meetings, not presidential whims.
In a fascinating yet troubling development, a New York father named James found himself ensnared in a web of delusion af...
CNN | Sep 05, 2025, 09:05OpenAI has revealed plans to create an AI-focused job platform aimed at enhancing AI literacy and expanding its suite of...
CNBC | Sep 05, 2025, 07:20Porsche is making headlines as it prepares to introduce the first production vehicle equipped with wireless charging tec...
Business Today | Sep 05, 2025, 09:05A groundbreaking whitepaper by Mercedes-Benz Research and Development India (MBRDI) and The Energy and Resources Institu...
Business Today | Sep 05, 2025, 08:30Tesla is seeking shareholder approval for an ambitious new compensation package for CEO Elon Musk, as revealed in a fina...
CNBC | Sep 05, 2025, 10:35