Epic celebrates “the end of the Apple Tax” after appeals court win in iOS payments case

Epic celebrates “the end of the Apple Tax” after appeals court win in iOS payments case

In a landmark decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has largely upheld a previous contempt ruling against Apple, reinforcing the judgment made by District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April. This ruling found that Apple had willfully violated an injunction aimed at opening up payment options for iOS developers. Epic Games' CEO, Tim Sweeney, expressed optimism regarding the ruling, stating that it could significantly benefit developers and instigate changes to the App Store landscape globally. The appellate court, comprised of a panel of three judges, confirmed that Apple's initial attempt to impose a hefty 27 percent fee on developers opting for external payment methods had a restrictive impact, contravening the injunction. The court criticized Apple for imposing overly broad restrictions on how external payment links were designed, suggesting that the company should present both internal and external payment options similarly. Additionally, the ruling highlighted that Apple acted in bad faith by not adhering to the injunction and dismissing compliant alternatives during internal discussions. The appellate court also dismissed Apple's arguments centered around procedural claims, affirming that the district court accurately assessed materials Apple deemed protected by attorney-client privilege. While the district court originally prohibited Apple from charging fees for payments processed outside of its App Store, the appeals court acknowledged that Apple could still impose a 'reasonable fee' based on its actual costs related to user security and privacy. Moving forward, it will be up to Apple and the district court to define what constitutes a 'reasonable fee.' In a statement to reporters, Sweeney proposed that these fees should be minimal, suggesting amounts in the range of tens or hundreds of dollars for each iOS app update submitted for review. This approach, he argues, would ensure fair compensation for the employees reviewing applications while promoting a system of standard fees that align with regular business practices.

Sources : Ars Technica

Published On : Dec 12, 2025, 16:05

Streaming
Kalshi Challenges Netflix Over Controversial Documentary Trailer

Kalshi, the prediction market platform, has taken significant legal steps against Netflix, sending a cease-and-desist le...

TechCrunch | Jul 25, 2026, 17:10
Kalshi Challenges Netflix Over Controversial Documentary Trailer
AI
Nvidia Strikes Major Deal with SK Hynix to Secure AI Memory Supply

Nvidia has successfully forged a significant partnership with South Korea's SK Hynix to secure memory supplies essential...

CNBC | Jul 25, 2026, 05:15
Nvidia Strikes Major Deal with SK Hynix to Secure AI Memory Supply
Startups
Warner Bros. Takes Legal Action Against Amazon Over Executive Poaching Allegations

Warner Bros. Discovery has initiated legal proceedings against Amazon, accusing the tech giant of unlawful interference ...

TechCrunch | Jul 25, 2026, 21:25
Warner Bros. Takes Legal Action Against Amazon Over Executive Poaching Allegations
AI
Hugging Face CEO Calls for Action Following AI Security Breach

In a dramatic turn of events within the AI landscape, Hugging Face faced a significant security breach involving an AI a...

Business Insider | Jul 25, 2026, 20:30
Hugging Face CEO Calls for Action Following AI Security Breach
Startups
AI Transformations Lead to Major Job Cuts at Tech Giants

Monday.com, the innovative work management platform based in Tel Aviv, has recently announced significant layoffs, attri...

TechCrunch | Jul 26, 2026, 01:45
AI Transformations Lead to Major Job Cuts at Tech Giants
View All News