
In a pivotal ruling, a federal judge has stated that Google will not be required to divest its Chrome browser or Android operating system. This decision marks a significant victory for the tech giant in the midst of an extensive antitrust case that deemed the company to be operating an illegal monopoly in online search. While Google retains control over Chrome and Android, the court has imposed restrictions on the company, barring it from entering into or maintaining exclusive agreements related to the distribution of its services, including Chrome, Search, the Google Assistant, and its Gemini app. These contracts are crucial for Google's revenue and accessibility to its services, although the company had previously suggested abandoning them as a potential resolution to the case. US District Court Judge Amit Mehta indicated that he has accepted some of Google's proposed remedies. This trial scrutinizes Google's fundamental business practices at a time when it faces increasing competition from AI-driven chatbots. Additionally, the company is preparing to defend its online advertising operations, which have also been labeled as an illegal monopoly earlier this year. The court's filing confirmed, "Google will not be mandated to divest Chrome; nor will the court enforce a conditional divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment." Google has not yet commented on the ruling. This decision has drawn significant attention from Silicon Valley, as numerous other tech companies are currently battling antitrust investigations initiated by the US government. Last fall, Judge Mehta ruled that Google had violated US antitrust laws concerning its search business, asserting that the company operates as a monopolist to sustain its market dominance. During the lengthy remedies phase of the trial, Google argued that the Justice Department's proposed actions could harm consumers by complicating access to their preferred search engine and potentially hindering the US economy and technological leadership. Chrome leader Parisa Tabriz warned that forcing Google to sell Chrome could lead to a diminished version of the browser, potentially rendering it "insecure and obsolete." This story is still unfolding and will be updated as new information becomes available.
In a significant move reflecting the escalating tensions in the tech sector, China has blocked Meta's acquisition of the...
Ars Technica | Apr 27, 2026, 18:15
In a significant shift in the landscape of artificial intelligence partnerships, OpenAI and Microsoft have announced an ...
Ars Technica | Apr 27, 2026, 20:15
In January, the European Commission launched an investigation into Google's integration of artificial intelligence withi...
Ars Technica | Apr 27, 2026, 20:05
Shares of memory industry giants Micron and Sandisk surged on Monday, continuing an impressive upward trend. This spike ...
CNBC | Apr 27, 2026, 20:35When you step into a venue famed for its ghostly legends, that eerie feeling might not originate from the supernatural. ...
Ars Technica | Apr 27, 2026, 18:05