Apple joins Anthropic and OpenAI in facing lawsuits over AI and copyright

Apple joins Anthropic and OpenAI in facing lawsuits over AI and copyright

Apple has found itself amidst a burgeoning legal confrontation regarding the use of copyrighted materials for training artificial intelligence. Two authors have initiated a lawsuit in a federal court in Northern California, alleging that the tech giant improperly utilized their books without authorization or compensation. The class action suit, filed on Friday, asserts that Apple included protected literary works in a dataset comprised of pirated content, which was allegedly employed to develop its 'OpenELM' large language models. Authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson contend that Apple neglected to secure consent or offer any form of remuneration, despite the lucrative prospects of its AI technologies. Both Apple and the authors' legal teams have refrained from commenting on the matter. This lawsuit is part of a broader trend, as numerous technology companies face increasing litigation over intellectual property issues in the realm of artificial intelligence. Earlier this week, AI startup Anthropic revealed a significant $1.5 billion settlement with a collective of authors who alleged that their works were used without permission to enhance the Claude chatbot. This settlement, which Anthropic accepted without admitting wrongdoing, has been characterized by attorneys as the largest known copyright settlement to date. Lawyers representing the authors in the Anthropic case emphasized the importance of this settlement in sending a clear warning to AI developers regarding the misuse of copyrighted materials. 'This agreement serves as a strong reminder that appropriating copyrighted works from unauthorized sources is unacceptable,' stated Justin Nelson from Susman Godfrey. The settlement is among the first to emerge from a series of copyright lawsuits directed at AI firms, including Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta, and Midjourney, concerning their use of proprietary content from the internet. In contrast, some competitors have proactively established licensing agreements with publishers to circumvent potential legal challenges, a strategy that Anthropic has yet to disclose any involvement in.

Sources : Mint

Published On : Sep 08, 2025, 09:21

AI
China's AI Giants Battle for Attention with Lavish Lunar New Year Giveaways

As the Year of the Horse approaches, China's artificial intelligence sector is engaging in a fierce competition dubbed t...

CNBC | Feb 13, 2026, 22:25
China's AI Giants Battle for Attention with Lavish Lunar New Year Giveaways
Gadgets
Nothing Launches Its First Indian Retail Experience in Bengaluru

Nothing, the innovative hardware firm supported by Tiger Global, has officially inaugurated its first retail store in In...

TechCrunch | Feb 14, 2026, 07:10
Nothing Launches Its First Indian Retail Experience in Bengaluru
Mobile
Verizon Introduces Lengthy Wait for Unlocking Fully Paid Phones

Verizon has recently implemented a new policy that adds a significant delay for customers looking to unlock their fully ...

Ars Technica | Feb 13, 2026, 22:15
Verizon Introduces Lengthy Wait for Unlocking Fully Paid Phones
Science
WHO Critiques US-Funded Vaccine Study as Unethical and Harmful

The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a strong condemnation of a vaccine trial funded by the United States, lab...

Ars Technica | Feb 13, 2026, 23:20
WHO Critiques US-Funded Vaccine Study as Unethical and Harmful
Gadgets
Meta's Controversial Facial Recognition Plans: Are We Too Distracted to Notice?

Since the debut of Meta's Ray-Ban Smart Glasses in 2021, a contentious debate has persisted regarding their potential us...

Business Insider | Feb 13, 2026, 22:05
Meta's Controversial Facial Recognition Plans: Are We Too Distracted to Notice?
View All News