AI companies are spending millions to thwart this former tech exec’s congressional bid

Recent advertisements attacking New York Assembly member Alex Bores highlight his previous affiliation with Palantir, a key player in AI technology that has faced scrutiny for its collaboration with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The ads claim that Bores profited significantly from developing technology for ICE's deportation efforts. However, Bores clarifies that he left Palantir in 2019 due to ethical concerns over its work with ICE. Currently, Bores is campaigning for the 12th congressional district in New York, facing substantial financial opposition from a super PAC named Leading the Future. This group, backed by prominent figures in the tech industry, including Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale and OpenAI President Greg Brockman, has raised an impressive $125 million to influence state elections related to AI regulation. Bores asserts that they are committed to spending at least $10 million against him, as they view him as a significant challenge to their interests. Bores, who has a strong tech background and aims to bring informed perspectives to Congress, is positioning himself as a candidate who understands the implications of AI on society. He points out that if elected, he would be one of the few Democrats in Congress with a computer science degree. His legislative efforts include sponsoring the RAISE Act, an AI transparency law mandating large AI companies to maintain publicly accessible safety plans and report catastrophic incidents. Despite his push for regulation, Bores suggests that Leading the Future's agenda is to avoid any substantial AI oversight, preferring federal-level control that sidesteps state regulations. He highlights the ongoing battle between states and the tech industry, particularly after former President Trump issued an executive order against state AI laws, including his own. Bores has also proposed a comprehensive national AI governance strategy with numerous policy recommendations aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability in AI technologies. Meanwhile, other PACs, like those supported by Meta, are also actively funding candidates favorable to the tech industry's interests. Bores argues that the overwhelming financial influence of tech giants in political races is concerning, particularly in contrast to the modest fundraising capabilities of typical assembly races. He believes that the majority of Americans recognize the potential of AI but are wary of its rapid advancement and the government's ability to effectively regulate it for the greater good. As Bores continues his campaign, he garners support from groups advocating for a balanced approach to AI development, contrasting with the aggressive tactics employed by some tech-backed organizations. His message resonates with a growing base of tech workers who are increasingly concerned about the ethical implications of AI and its impact on society.