4chan refuses to pay UK Online Safety Act fines, asks Trump admin to intervene

4chan refuses to pay UK Online Safety Act fines, asks Trump admin to intervene

In a bold move, the legal representatives of 4chan have declared that the controversial imageboard will not comply with financial penalties imposed under the United Kingdom's Online Safety Act. Attorney Preston Byrne articulated this stance during an interview with BBC, asserting that the notices from Ofcom do not impose any legal requirements for 4chan in the United States. Byrne characterized the UK regulator's scrutiny as part of an 'illegal campaign of harassment' aimed at American tech companies. He emphasized, '4chan has not violated any laws in the United States. My client will not pay any fines.' The investigation by Ofcom began in June, focusing on whether 4chan is adequately preventing its platform from being exploited for illegal activities. On August 13, Ofcom disclosed that it has issued a provisional notice of contravention to 4chan Community Support LLC for neglecting two requests for information. The regulator is still evaluating whether 4chan has failed to fulfill its obligations to safeguard users from illegal content. Ofcom is reportedly considering an initial fine of £20,000, which could escalate with daily penalties. The maximum potential fines under this act could reach £18 million or 10% of the company's global revenue, depending on which amount is higher. When approached for comment, Ofcom refrained from discussing the ongoing investigation. Legal expert Emma Drake highlighted the complexities involved in enforcing penalties against an offshore entity like 4chan. She noted that Ofcom could explore alternative measures, such as seeking court orders to disrupt the website's UK operations by removing it from search results or blocking UK payment channels. In extreme cases, Ofcom might even request that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) restrict access to the site from the UK. 4chan has faced significant scrutiny in the past, including temporary bans by ISPs in Australia and New Zealand in 2019 when it was found to be hosting a video of the Christchurch mass shooting. The site has been labeled in research as one of the most toxic environments on the Internet, notorious for hate speech, trolling, and various forms of harmful content. Furthermore, the site experienced a major outage following a significant hacking incident in April, which underscores the challenges it faces as an online platform.

Sources : Ars Technica

Published On : Aug 22, 2025, 19:10

AI
Anthropic's Innovative Approach Challenges AI Industry Norms

In the heart of San Francisco, Anthropic's President and co-founder, Daniela Amodei, emphasizes a guiding principle that...

CNBC | Jan 03, 2026, 13:15
Anthropic's Innovative Approach Challenges AI Industry Norms
Startups
Last Chance to Contribute and Win Amazing Prizes in Our Charity Drive!

Time is running out to participate in this year’s Charity Drive sweepstakes! If you've been caught up in enjoying Ars’ t...

Ars Technica | Jan 02, 2026, 17:20
Last Chance to Contribute and Win Amazing Prizes in Our Charity Drive!
AI
Yann LeCun Critiques Meta's AI Leadership and Predicts Departures

Renowned AI pioneer Yann LeCun has expressed skepticism regarding Meta's choice to appoint Alexandr Wang, co-founder of ...

Business Insider | Jan 02, 2026, 18:30
Yann LeCun Critiques Meta's AI Leadership and Predicts Departures
Science
Astronomers Discover Saturn-Mass Planet in Rogue Region of Space

In a groundbreaking discovery, astronomers have identified a Saturn-sized planet located in a unique area of space known...

Ars Technica | Jan 02, 2026, 20:55
Astronomers Discover Saturn-Mass Planet in Rogue Region of Space
AI
Visionaries Predict a Wealthy Future Driven by AI and Automation

As discussions around the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) intensify, tech leaders like Elon Musk and Bill Gate...

Business Insider | Jan 03, 2026, 10:00
Visionaries Predict a Wealthy Future Driven by AI and Automation
View All News